Mazemind Tome

Top Performing Decklists

Deck Creator Record Best Finish
Dimir Control qqqwwweee 5-0 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949
Dimir Control crystalpalacefc 5-0 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097
Unknown Archetype gigachadsigmamale 6-2 None
Unknown Archetype kinghairy 4-2 None
Dimir Control jps_17 4-3 None

Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)

Win Rate Impact
-1.3%
vs average deck
Top Table Win Rate
73.7%
placement-weighted
Meta Trend
-18.4%
recent vs earlier
Sample Size
10
decks
Tournament Results
2
1st place
3
top 8
Average Copies
2.8
per deck

Meta Performance Analysis

Mazemind Tome ranks #158 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 47%).

Game Impact Factor
77.60
How much this card influences game outcomes
Color Differential
+14.44%

Colorless average: 54.3%

Performance compared to other Colorless cards

Based on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Mazemind Tome is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.

Recommended number of copies: 1

Win Rate Timeline

Card Efficiency Analysis

Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
34.4
Win percentage points per mana invested
Relative Efficiency
0.49x
Compared to average cards of same mana value

Performance Efficiency: 10.31 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)

At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.7%. Mazemind Tome has a win rate of 68.8%, making it 1.3% worse than other 2-mana cards.

Top Performing Partners

Card Name Type Deck Count Win Rate 1st Places
Phyrexian Arena Enchantment 5 74.3% 3
The Eternal Wanderer Legendary Planeswalker 5 72.0% 3
Disdainful Stroke Instant 10 71.8% 4
Urza's Sylex Legendary Artifact 10 71.1% 2
Lightning Helix Instant 7 64.7% 3
Parting Gust Instant 11 60.1% 1
Oildeep Gearhulk Artifact Creature — Construct 38 59.1% 9
Ancient Vendetta Sorcery 12 58.5% 1
Phyrexian Obliterator Creature — Phyrexian Horror 30 57.7% 8
Binding Negotiation Sorcery 6 57.7% 0

Card Synergy Analysis

Cards that perform better with Mazemind Tome than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.

Card Name Type Mana Decks Win Rate Together Win Rate Apart Synergy Score
Jace, the Perfected Mind Legendary Planeswalker — Jace 4 5 73.9% 67.4% +6.5%
Go for the Throat Instant 2 5 73.9% 68.6% +5.3%
Duress Sorcery 1 5 73.9% 68.8% +5.2%
Tishana's Tidebinder Creature — Merfolk Wizard 3 7 74.3% 69.2% +5.1%
Ghost Vacuum Artifact 1 6 73.9% 69.4% +4.6%
Change the Equation Instant 2 6 69.8% 67.4% +2.3%
Stock Up Sorcery 3 9 71.7% 70.3% +1.4%
Negate Instant 2 9 68.2% 70.2% -2.0%
Three Steps Ahead Instant 1 7 67.6% 70.5% -2.8%

Top Archetypes

Archetype Deck Count % of Archetype Win Rate
Dimir Control 49 67.1% 57.5%
Dimir Midrange 27 1.3% 64.0%
Unknown Archetype 22 7.0% 42.9%
Orzhov Control 19 86.4% 37.0%
Azorius Control 18 4.9% 39.2%

Statistics Explanation

Statistic Description Formula
Win Rate Impact How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks)
Top Table Win Rate A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight)
Meta Trend Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period)
Confidence Factor A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). log10(Number of decks + 1)
Average Copies The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks)
Card Synergy Score Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates)
Raw Efficiency Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. (Win rate) / (Mana value)
Relative Efficiency How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value)
Performance Efficiency Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value)
Game Impact Factor A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100)
Color Differential How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. Win rate - Average win rate for same color

All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.